A new study led by UCRH academic Natalie Edmiston has shed light on what motivates doctors and nurses to work as medical and forensic examiners in sexual assault services, and what makes it hard for them to stay. The study has now been published in the Medical Journal of Australia.
The researchers interviewed 31 health professionals across NSW, including those currently in the role, those who had recently left, and those who had trained but never started. Their stories revealed a mix of strong personal motivation and serious challenges.
Many participants said they were deeply committed to supporting people who have experienced sexual assault. But without enough organisational support, that commitment often turned into a heavy burden. Being on call was one of the biggest stressors, interrupting personal time, creating feelings of isolation, and making it harder to cope with the emotional toll of the work.
Another major challenge was the legal side of the role. While some found the medicolegal responsibilities rewarding, others felt overwhelmed by the high expectations and lack of training in this area.
The study found that better staffing, more workplace-based education, and stronger peer and supervisor support could make a big difference. With the right support, these vital roles can be more sustainable, and more professionals may be encouraged to take them on.
The message is clear: doctors and nurses are willing to do this important work, but they need the right conditions to do it safely and effectively.
